Wednesday, May 9, 2012
How to Read and Why By Harold Bloom
How to Read and Why
By Harold Bloom
(2000)
“There is no
single way to read well, though there is a prime reason why we should
read. Information is endlessly available to us; where shall wisdom be
found? If you are fortunate, you encounter a particular teacher who
can help, yet finally you are alone, going on without further
mediation. Reading well is one of the great pleasures that solitude
can afford you, because it is, atleast in my opintion, the most
healing of pleasures. It returns you to otherness....imaginative
literature is otherness and as such, aleviates loneliness.” P.19
“It matters, if
individuals are to retain any ablility to form their own judgement's
and opinions, that they continue to read for themselves. How they
read, well or badly, and what they read, cannot depend wholly on
themselves, but why they read must be for and in their own
interests.” P.21
“Ultimately we
read---as Bacon, Johnson and Emerson agree---in order to strenthen
the self, and to learn its authentic interests.” P.22
“The pleasures of
reading indeed are selfish rather than social. You cannot directly
improve anyone else's life by reading better or more deeply. I remain
sceptical of the traditional social hope that care for others may be
stimulated by the growth of individual imagination, and I am wary of
any arguments whatsoever that connect the pleasures of solitary
reading to the public good.” P.22
“Do not attempt
to improve your neighbor or your neigborhood by what or how you read.
Self-improvement is a large enough project for your mind and spirit:
there are no eithic of reading.” P.24
“You need not
fear that the freedom of your development as a reader is selfish,
because if you become an authentic reader, the the response to your
labors will confirm you as an illumination to others” P.24
“We read,
frequently if unknowingly, in quest of a mind more original than our
own.” P.25
“We read
Shakespeare, Dante, Chaucer, Cervantes, Dickens, Proust, and all
their peers because they more than enlarge life.” P.28
“We read deeply
for varied reasons, most of them familiar: that we cannot know enough
people profoundly enough; that we need to know ourselves better; that
we require knowledge, not just of self and others but of the way
things are. Yet strongest, most authentic motive for deep reading the
now much abused traditional canon is the search for a difficult
pleasure.” P.29
“Read deeply, not
to believe, not to accept, not to contradict, but to learn to share
in that one nature that writes and reads.” P.29
Classics for Pleasure By Michael Dirda
Classics for Pleasure
By Michael Dirda
2007
“Classics are classics not because
they are educational, but because people have found them worth
reading, generation after generation, century after century. More
than anything else, great books speak to us of our own real feelings
anf failings, of our all-too-human daydreams and confusions.” P.1
Why Read The Classics? By Italo Calvino
Why Read The Classics?
By Italo Calvino translated by Martin
Mclaughlin
(1991) Penguin Books, London.
“This youthful reading can be
(perhaps at the same time) literally formative in that it gives form
or shape to our future experiences, providing them with models, ways
of dealing with them, terms of comparison, schemes for categorizing
them, scales of value, paradigms of beauty: all things which continue
to operate in us even when we remember little or nothing about the
book we read when young.” P.4
“Reading a classic must also surprise
us, when we compare it to the image we previously had of it. That is
why we can never recommend enough a first-hand reading of the text
itself, avoiding as far as possible secondary bibliography,
commentaries, and other interpretations.” P.5
“There is a reversal of values here
which is very widespread, which means that the introduction, critical
apparatus, and bibliography are used like a smokescreen to conceal
what the text has to say and what it can only say if it is left to
speak without intermediaries who claim to know more than the text
itself.” P5-6
“it is no use reading the classics
out of a sense of duty or respect, we should only read them for
love.” P.6
“'Your' classic is a book to which
you cannot remain indifferent, and which helps you define yourself in
relation or even in opposition to it.” P.7
“After that I should really rewrite
it a third time, so that people do not believe that the classics must
be read because they serve some purpose. The only reason that can be adduced in their favour is that reading the classics is always
better then not reading them.” P.9
"On Stories" By C.S. Lewis
P. 12
Notice here the corollary. If some
fatal progress of applied science ever enables us in fact to reach
the Moon, that real journey will not at all satisfy the impulse which
we now seek to gratify by writing such stories. The real Moon, if you
could reach it and survive, would in a deep and deadly sense be just
like anywhere else. You would find cold, hunger, hardship and danger;
and after the first few hours they would be simply cold,
hunger hardship and danger as you might have met on earth. And death
would be simply death among those bleached
craters as it is simply death in a nursing home at Sheffield. No man
would find an abiding strangeness on the Moon unless he were the sort
of man who could find it in his own back garden. “He who would
bring home the wealth of the Indies must carry the wealth of the
Indies with him.
P. 16
Something which the educated receive
from poetry can reach the masses through stories of adventure.
P.16
An literary reader can be defined as
one who reads books once only. There is hope for a man who has never
read Malory or Boswell or Tristram Shandy or
Shakespeare's Sonnet: but
what can you do with a man who says he “has read” them, meaning
that he has read them once, and he thinks this settles the
matter....If you find that the reader of popular romances—however
uneducated the read, however bad the romances—goes back to his old
favorites again and again, then you have pretty good evidence that
they are to him a sort of poetry.
P. 17
We do not enjoy a story fully at the
first reading. Not till the curiousity, the sheer narrative lust, has
been given its sop and laid alseep, are we at leisure to savour the
real beauties. Till then it is like wasting great wine on ravenous
natural thurst which merely want cold wetness.
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
A Text Message
After doing my survey a friend text me and wrote "Sounds fascinating! I imagine that kind of app could be quite successful - my guess (although it's only a guess) is that YA would read a lot more if their were better discovery mechanisms available."
I like that wording - better discovery mechanisms. Although it implies an app that could do what Amazon does with its "people who bought this also bought..." I think that showing off scenes and storylines and characters in trailers/illustration is definitely a discovery mechanism.
I like that wording - better discovery mechanisms. Although it implies an app that could do what Amazon does with its "people who bought this also bought..." I think that showing off scenes and storylines and characters in trailers/illustration is definitely a discovery mechanism.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)